- Select City
Bajaj Maxima Z Vs Piaggio Ape Auto DX Comparison
- VS
Bajaj Maxima Z vs Piaggio Ape Auto DX
Should you buy Bajaj Maxima Z or Piaggio Ape Auto DX? Compare the models on the basis of their price, dimension, fuel type, payload capacity, Chasis type, number of tyres, GVW & other safety features. Maxima Z has 236.2 cc engine & Ape Auto DX has 230.7 cc engine. Find out which commercial vehicle is best for you.
Read More...
| Basic Information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Model Name | Maxima Z | Ape Auto DX |
| Brand Name | ||
| On Road Price | ₹ 1.96 Lakh | ₹ 3.52 Lakh |
| User Rating | ||
| Body Type | Auto Rickshaw | Auto Rickshaw |
| Finance Available (EMI) | ₹ 3,791.00 | ₹ 6,828.00 |
| Performance | ||
|---|---|---|
| Max Power | 9 hp | 10.05 hp |
| Displacement (cc) | 236.2 | 230.7 |
| Fuel Tank (Litres) | 40 (5.6kg) | 20.6 |
| Engine | 4 Stroke oil cooled | Forced Air Cooled with 3 Valve Tech |
| Fuel Type | CNG | LPG |
| Emission Norms | BS-VI | BS-VI |
| Max Torque | 16.2 Nm | 18.7 Nm |
| Acceleration | - | - |
| Mileage City | - | - |
| Mileage Highway | - | - |
| Top Speed | - | - |
| Mileage | - | 30 |
| Gradeability (%) | 21 | 26.2 |
| Max Speed (km/h) | - | 60 |
| Engine Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Turning Radius (mm) | 2880 | - |
| Dimension | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall Length (mm) | 2835 | 2940 |
| Overall Width (mm) | 1350 | 1470 |
| Overall Height (mm) | 1780 | 1950 |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 194 | 200 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2000 | 1920 |
| Axle Configuration | - | - |
| Transmission & Loading Capacity | ||
|---|---|---|
| Transmission | Manual | Manual |
| Payload (Kgs) | - | - |
| GVW / GCW (Kgs) | ||
| Kerb Weight (Kgs) | 482 | 453 |
| Gear Box | 4-Speed | 4-Speed |
| Clutch | Wet, Multiplate | Multi Disc Wet Type |
| Power Steering | No | No |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Steering | Handle Bar | Handle Bar |
| A/C | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Navigation System | No | No |
| Telematics | No | No |
| Tiltable Steering | No | No |
| Arm-rest | No | No |
| Seat Type | Yes | Yes |
| Driver Information Display | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable Driver Seat | No | No |
| Seating Capacity | D+4 Passanger | D+3 |
| Tubeless Tyres | No | No |
| Seat Belts | - | - |
| Hill Hold | No | No |
| Brakes & Suspension | ||
|---|---|---|
| Brakes | Hydraulic Drum Brakes | Drum Brake |
| Front Axle | - | - |
| Front Suspension | - | Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber with Helical Compression Spring with Damper |
| Rear Axle | - | - |
| Rear Suspension | Helical coil compression spring | Hydraulic Telescopic Shock Absorber with Rubber Compression Spring with Damper |
| ABS | No | No |
| Parking Brakes | Yes | Yes |
| Body Option & Cabin Type | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin |
| Body Option | Fully Built | Fully Built |
| Cabin Type | Day Cabin | Day Cabin |
| Tiltable Cabin | No | No |
| Tyres | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number of Tyre | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Tyre | 4.00 - 10, 6 PR | 4.50 - 10, 8 PR |
| Front Tyre | 4.00 - 10, 6 PR | 4.50 - 10, 8 PR |
| Others | ||
|---|---|---|
| No. Of Axles | - | - |
| Axle Types | - | - |
| Body Brakes | - | - |
| Chassis | Yes | Yes |
| Floor Type | - | - |
| Body Material | - | - |
| Canopy Length | - | - |
| Water Tank Capacity (KL) | - | - |
| Water Tank Type | - | - |
| No. Of Valves | - | - |
| Pump Type | - | - |
| Bulker Type | - | - |
| Bulker Discharge Pipe | - | - |
| Bulker Air Inlet Pipe | - | - |
| Bulker Equipments | - | - |
| Bulker Electricals | - | - |
| Bulker Pressure | - | - |
| Floor Material | - | - |
| Side Board Material | - | - |
| Rear Board Material | - | - |
| External/Interior Surface | - | - |
| Refrigerating Unit | - | - |
| Temperature Range | - | - |
| Battery(Volts) | 12 V, 32 Ah | 12V DC 50Ah |
| Fog Lights | - | - |
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Cons
Maxima Z Comparison with similar trucks
Ape Auto DX Comparison with similar trucks
Recommended Auto Rickshaw
- Popular
- Latest
User Reviews of Comparison
- Bajaj Maxima Z
- Piaggio Ape Auto DX
×
Which is your city ?