- Select City
Kinetic Safar Jumbo Vs Piaggio Ape E Xtra Comparison
- VS
Kinetic Safar Jumbo vs Piaggio Ape E Xtra
Should you buy Kinetic Safar Jumbo or Piaggio Ape E Xtra? Compare the models on the basis of their price, dimension, fuel type, payload capacity, Chasis type, number of tyres, GVW & other safety features. Safar Jumbo has -- cc engine & Ape E Xtra has -- cc engine. Find out which commercial vehicle is best for you.
Read More...
| Basic Information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Model Name | Safar Jumbo | Ape E Xtra |
| Brand Name | ||
| On Road Price | ₹ 3.40 Lakh | ₹ 3.12 Lakh |
| User Rating | - | |
| Body Type | 3 Wheeler | 3 Wheeler |
| Finance Available (EMI) | ₹ 6,566.00 | ₹ 6,038.00 |
| Performance | ||
|---|---|---|
| Max Power | - | 12 hp |
| Displacement (cc) | - | - |
| Fuel Tank (Litres) | - | - |
| Engine | - | - |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Electric |
| Emission Norms | - | BS-VI |
| Max Torque | - | 45 Nm |
| Acceleration | - | - |
| Mileage City | - | - |
| Mileage Highway | - | - |
| Top Speed | - | 45 |
| Mileage | 120 | 90-100 |
| Gradeability (%) | 7 | 17 |
| Max Speed (km/h) | - | - |
| Engine Cylinders | - | - |
| Turning Radius (mm) | - | - |
| Dimension | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall Length (mm) | 3272 | 3315 |
| Overall Width (mm) | 1356 | 1490 |
| Overall Height (mm) | 2276 | 1770 |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 295 | 220 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | - | 2100 |
| Axle Configuration | - | - |
| Length {mm (ft.)} | - | 1830 |
| Width {mm (ft.)} | - | 1400 |
| Height {mm (ft.)} | - | 285 |
| Transmission & Loading Capacity | ||
|---|---|---|
| Transmission | Direct Drive | PT gear with differential (Integral) |
| Payload (Kgs) | 500 | 506 |
| GVW / GCW (Kgs) | ||
| Kerb Weight (Kgs) | - | NA |
| Clutch | - | - |
| Power Steering | - | No |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Steering | Handel Bar Type | Handle bar type |
| A/C | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Navigation System | No | No |
| Telematics | No | No |
| Tiltable Steering | No | No |
| Arm-rest | No | No |
| Seat Type | Yes | Yes |
| Driver Information Display | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable Driver Seat | No | No |
| Seating Capacity | D+2 | Driver Only |
| Tubeless Tyres | No | No |
| Seat Belts | - | - |
| Hill Hold | No | Yes |
| Brakes & Suspension | ||
|---|---|---|
| Brakes | Drum Brake | Drum brake hydraulically actuated |
| Front Axle | - | - |
| Front Suspension | Stable Independent | Helical spring with dampener |
| Rear Axle | - | - |
| Rear Suspension | - | Rubber spring with dampener |
| ABS | No | No |
| Parking Brakes | Yes | Yes |
| Body Option & Cabin Type | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Chassis with Cabin | Chassis with Cabin |
| Body Option | Box body | Deck Body |
| Cabin Type | Day Cabin | Day Cabin |
| Tiltable Cabin | No | No |
| Tyres | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number of Tyre | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Tyre | - | 4.5 - 10 |
| Front Tyre | - | 4.5 - 10 |
| Others | ||
|---|---|---|
| No. Of Axles | - | - |
| Axle Types | - | - |
| Body Brakes | - | - |
| Chassis | Yes | Yes |
| Electricals | - | 48V / 3000W Off-board charger |
| Floor Type | - | - |
| Body Material | - | - |
| Canopy Length | - | - |
| Water Tank Capacity (KL) | - | - |
| Water Tank Type | - | - |
| No. Of Valves | - | - |
| Pump Type | - | - |
| Bulker Discharge Pipe | - | - |
| Bulker Air Inlet Pipe | - | - |
| Bulker Equipments | - | - |
| Bulker Pressure | - | - |
| Floor Material | - | - |
| Side Board Material | - | - |
| Rear Board Material | - | - |
| External/Interior Surface | - | - |
| Refrigerating Unit | - | - |
| Temperature Range | - | - |
| Battery(Volts) | - | Lithium lon, 48V (8 kWh) |
| Fog Lights | - | - |
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Cons
- A higher payload of 500 kg makes the Safar Jumbo useful e-rickshaw cargo
- A big storage box of 150 cubic meters makes it easy to carry a high volume of cargo
- Profitable to run with lowest running cost compared to diesel/CNG/petrol vehicles
- Stable and independent suspension makes it easy to carry the heavy load comfortably
- Modern Lithium-ion battery
- Overall strongly built vehicle with high ground clearance and gradeability
- Piaggio is offering its most popular cargo auto-rickshaw in electric avatar with equal value for money proposition
- The 6ft cargo deck is large with a lot of pulling power on all types of terrains
- The built quality of this electric cargo auto is at par with its diesel counterpart
- Benefits of lower running cost, zero noise and pollutions
- 90 km of range of single charge should last day-long operations
- Superbly packed zero pollution vehicle from the market leader that comes with embedded iconnect telematics solutions for better vehicle utilisation
- 500 kg of payload is a good bargain for an all-electric cargo three-wheeler
Kinetic Safar Jumbo
Piaggio Ape E Xtra
- Slightly higher charging time
- Suitable only for higher cargo carrying needs
- The nearly 4 hours battery charging time is too high
- Scope to improve on key specs
- 45 km/h top-speed looks on the lower side
- A more powerful, long-range variant would appeal to a wider customer base
Kinetic Safar Jumbo
Piaggio Ape E Xtra
Safar Jumbo Comparison with similar trucks
- VS
Kinetic Safar JumboFrom ₹ 3.40 Lakh *Mahindra Treo Zor₹ 3.12 - ₹ 3.48 Lakh *
Ape E Xtra Comparison with similar trucks
- VSPiaggio Ape E XtraFrom ₹ 3.12 Lakh *Mahindra Treo Zor₹ 3.12 - ₹ 3.48 Lakh *
- VSPiaggio Ape E XtraFrom ₹ 3.12 Lakh *Euler Motors Hi LoadFrom ₹ 3.79 Lakh *
Recommended 3 Wheeler
- Popular
- Latest
- Piaggio Ape Xtra LDX₹ 2.45 - ₹ 2.48 Lakh*
- Power 9.4 hp
- GVW 975
- Mileage -
- Engine 599
- Fuel Tank 10.5
- Payload -
- Mahindra Alfa Plus₹ 2.79 - ₹ 2.85 Lakh*
- Power 9 hp
- GVW 995
- Mileage 29.4
- Engine 597
- Fuel Tank 10.5
- Payload -
User Reviews of Comparison
- Piaggio Ape E Xtra
Shandaar capacity
Jab mein ek chota three-wheeler cargo vehicle khareedne wala tha, toh electric lena sahi hoga ki nahi ispe mujhey doub...
Not good vehicle,
Not good vehicle, not power on the hill or steep curve. Limited load carrying capacity. Don’t waste your money. We need ...
Ok ok
Ok ok electric auto from Piaggio. Not very best…...
Very unhappy and disappointed
Very unhappy and disappointed by the electric cargo truck because not performing my expectations. Chagrin is taking long...
E Xtra is best options.
Ape E-Xtra and Mahindra Treo Zor are the recent cargo three-wheeler that are offering good choice to customers who want ...
×
Which is your city ?